Conciseness

Dense and actionable throughout, with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; minor redundancy in that the 'Referência Rápida' and 'Racionalizações Comuns' tables restate earlier steps and 'Relação com commands/worktree.md' repeats dispatcher details. Not 5 because the check-ignore and baseline rules are stated three times each across prose and tables.

Actionability

Concrete executable commands throughout: 'git rev-parse --git-dir', 'git check-ignore -q .worktrees', 'git worktree add "$path" -b "$BRANCH_NAME"', and auto-detect setup blocks. Not 5 because 'npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...' is slash-notation rather than copy-paste ready and $LOCATION is defined only in prose.

Workflow Clarity

Explicit Passo 0→3 sequence with validation checkpoints (MUST 'git check-ignore', the submodule guard before concluding 'já estou num worktree') and error-recovery branches ('Se os testes falharem: reportar as falhas e perguntar', 'Fallback de sandbox' on permission failure), plus a checklist-style quick-reference table. Clearly matches the anchor for explicit validation with feedback loops; the destructive/batch cap does not apply since validation is present.

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained SKILL.md (~160 lines) with well-organized headers, numbered steps, and tables; pointers to kit components (commands/worktree.md, scripts/worktree.mjs, policies/) are clearly signaled and one level deep with no nested 'see X for the actual instructions' pattern. Not 5 because the quick-reference and rationalization tables restate inline material that could be consolidated or split out.

Specificity

The what-clause names the domain and one concrete action — 'Isola trabalho em Git worktrees com verificacoes de seguranca' — but 'verificacoes de seguranca' is generic, and the remaining actions (criar worktree, detectar isolamento, baseline de testes) appear only as trigger phrases rather than stated capabilities. Not 4 because several specific actions are never listed as capabilities; not 2 because a concrete action in a named domain is explicitly stated.

Completeness

Both parts are explicit: what ('Isola trabalho em Git worktrees com verificacoes de seguranca') and when ('Trigger em: ...' with an extensive list of concrete trigger phrases). Not 5 because the what is narrow — the protocol's actual capabilities (detecção de isolamento, setup de projeto, baseline de testes) are never stated as actions, sitting between the 4 and 5 anchors but closer to 4.

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural-term coverage including synonyms and variations: 'worktree', 'criar worktree', 'aninhar worktree', 'worktree dentro de worktree', 'trabalhar isolado', 'trabalho paralelo sem afetar o branch atual', plus tool names 'EnterWorktree' and 'git worktree add'. Clearly matches the comprehensive-synonyms anchor, and no common variation is missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (git worktree isolation) with distinct triggers like 'aninhar worktree', 'worktree dentro de worktree', 'EnterWorktree', and 'baseline de testes'. Minimal overlap risk — only a generic git skill could plausibly collide, and the trigger list is far more specific than any generic phrasing.