Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable design-guidance body with a clear assess-plan-improve-verify flow and concrete values and CSS patterns. Main weaknesses are duplicated sections that inflate token cost and a single external reference that does not resolve within this skill's bundle.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the spacing-scale guidance: 'Plan Layout Improvements' and 'Establish a Spacing System' repeat the same 'consistent scale (Tailwind, rem tokens, custom)' advice nearly verbatim — merge into one section; the same applies to the repeated squint-test and card-monotony points.
Fix the reference path: 'reference/spatial-design.md' is a file in another skill's bundle, not this one — either vendor a copy into this skill's references/ directory or reword to a plain instruction (e.g., 'see the frontend-design skill's spatial design reference') so the link doesn't dangle.
Add a short feedback loop after 'Verify Layout Improvements': instruct to fix any failed check and re-verify, and consider adding a compact complete CSS example (spacing tokens + a grid/flex pattern) to lift actionability to copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient bullet-style guidance, but there is real duplication: the spacing-scale advice appears nearly verbatim in both 'Plan Layout Improvements' and 'Establish a Spacing System', and the squint test, card-grid monotony, and 'left-aligned with asymmetry feels more designed' points each appear twice. Fits anchor 3 ('mostly efficient but could be tightened') better than anchor 4, where only minor trimming would be needed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete throughout for an instruction-only skill: pixel ranges (8-12px siblings, 48-96px sections), 'repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr))', 'grid-template-areas', clamp(), semantic token names (--space-xs), and a z-index scale. Not 5 because there are no complete copy-paste-ready examples covering common cases; comfortably above anchor 3 since guidance is directly executable, not pseudocode. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence — mandatory preparation (/frontend-design, /teach-impeccable), Assess, Plan, Improve, Verify — ending in an explicit verification checklist. Not 5 because there is no fix-and-recheck feedback loop after the Verify step and no mid-process checkpoints; not 3 since the sequence and a final validation checklist are present. No destructive/batch cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized, but the body's only reference points outside this bundle ('reference/spatial-design.md' from the frontend-design skill) — it is not resolvable within this skill, which has no references/ directory — and all detail lives inline with duplicated material that could be split out. Fits anchor 3 ('some structure but references not clearly resolvable / could be better organized') more than anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |