Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is token-efficient and offers concrete language-selection guidance with a clear routing workflow. Its main defect is progressive disclosure: all seven referenced per-language files are missing, turning the otherwise well-signaled navigation into dead links.
Suggestions
Add the referenced bundle files (python.md, go.md, rust.md, typescript.md, java.md, cpp.md, shell.md) or remove/relable the links so the matrix does not point to non-existent files.
If per-language files are not yet authored, mark the matrix entries as placeholders or link to a single consolidated reference until the bundle exists.
Consider noting how Claude should proceed when a requested language's detail file is absent, so routing does not dead-end.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean capability matrix plus a compact YAML selection guide with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The selection guide gives concrete framework recommendations (FastAPI/Django, Gin/Echo, Spring Boot, React/Vue, Next.js/Nuxt), providing actionable routing guidance; it stops short of fully executable code, which is acceptable for an index skill but leaves minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a single-purpose routing skill the action (pick the right language) is unambiguous and the selection guide sequences the decision clearly; it lacks explicit checkpoints, though none are needed for non-destructive routing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to python.md, go.md, rust.md, typescript.md, java.md, cpp.md, and shell.md are clearly signaled one level deep in the matrix, but none of these bundle files actually exist in the skill directory, so navigation breaks despite the good structure. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |