Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable workflow with concrete CLI commands, clear sequencing, and a verification checkpoint. The main gaps are minor redundancy in the guardrails and inline schema-pattern detail that could be split into a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean with executable commands and no concept-padding, but the Guardrails section restates rules already given in step 3 (e.g., 'Create ONE artifact per invocation', 'context and rules are constraints') and includes a filler line ('This shouldn't happen with a valid schema'), so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable `openspec list/status/instructions` commands and parses concrete JSON fields (schemaName, artifacts, template, outputPath), making guidance copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered 1–4 sequence with an explicit verification checkpoint ('Verify the artifact file exists after writing before marking progress') and per-invocation STOP points; the operation is single-artifact rather than batch/destructive, so no validation cap applies. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and runtime detail is delegated to `openspec instructions`, but with no bundle files and over 50 lines the inline spec-driven schema patterns (proposal/specs/design/tasks) are content that could live in a separate reference. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |