Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow with executable commands and clear validation feedback loops. Its only weakness is mild redundancy between the step body and the closing guidelines section.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated 'context and rules are constraints, not file content' guidance from the 'Artifact Creation Guidelines' section since it is already stated in step 4a, or consolidate it into one place to tighten token use.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean procedural commands, but the 'Artifact Creation Guidelines' section restates the context/rules constraint already given in step 4a and repeats dependency-reading guidance, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, executable `openspec` commands with flags, enumerates the exact JSON fields to parse, and names specific tools (TodoWrite, AskUserQuestion), giving copy-paste-ready guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–5 are clearly sequenced with validation checkpoints (re-run `openspec status --json` after each artifact, check `applyRequires` status is 'done') plus a guardrail to verify each file exists before proceeding. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single self-contained file with well-labeled sections (Input, Steps, Output, Artifact Creation Guidelines, Guardrails) and no nested external references, which is appropriate for a tightly-coupled workflow. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |