CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

startup-competitors

Deep competitive intelligence for any market. Analyzes competitors' products, pricing, customer sentiment, GTM strategy, and growth signals using real web data. Produces battle cards, pricing landscape, and feature matrix. Use when the user wants to understand their competitive landscape, analyze competitors, compare products in a market, or research who they're competing against. Triggers for "who are my competitors", "competitive analysis", "competitor research", "battle cards", "pricing comparison", "competitor pricing", "market players", "competitive intelligence", "competitive landscape", "who else is in this space", "competitive moat", or any request to profile, compare, or map competitors in a category. Works standalone — no prior startup-design session needed.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-architected orchestration skill with strong workflow sequencing, validation checkpoints, and clean progressive disclosure into real reference files. The main improvements are minor: reduce redundancy between inline reference callouts and the summary table, and consider inlining a compact agent-prompt skeleton so the body is copy-paste ready without opening references.

Suggestions

Collapse the inline 'Reference: Read references/X.md' callouts OR the bottom reference table into a single mechanism to remove the duplicated navigation and save tokens.

Inline a minimal copy-paste-ready agent prompt skeleton per wave (1-2 lines each) so the body is fully executable without first opening the reference files, lifting actionability to the top anchor.

Tighten the intake section's two-round question list into a single compact block since the skill itself notes over-interviewing is the risk to avoid.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts, but the inline 'Reference: Read references/X.md' callouts are duplicated by the full reference table at the bottom — a minor redundancy that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, specific guidance at every phase — named agents (A1/A2, B1/B2, C1/C2), named sources (G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Reddit), and detailed output-file section specs — but the copy-paste-ready agent prompt templates live one level deep in reference files rather than inline.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced multi-phase process (Phase 0 resume check → 1 intake → 1.5 depth → 2 three waves → post-research checkpoint → 3 synthesis → 3.5 verification) with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops ('If Critical issues found: Pause... fix first, or proceed as-is?').

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references; all 8 referenced files (honesty-protocol, research-principles, research-scaling, research-synthesis, the three wave files, verification-agent) exist in ./references/ and are organized with a when-to-read/lines/purpose table for easy navigation.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

An excellent description that is concrete, comprehensive, and fully explicit about both capabilities and triggering conditions. Third-person voice is maintained throughout and trigger terms are natural and varied.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Analyzes competitors' products, pricing, customer sentiment, GTM strategy, and growth signals' and 'Produces battle cards, pricing landscape, and feature matrix' — giving comprehensive coverage of capabilities.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Deep competitive intelligence... Analyzes... Produces battle cards, pricing landscape, and feature matrix') and when ('Use when the user wants to understand their competitive landscape...') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural trigger phrases users would actually say, including synonyms and variations: 'who are my competitors', 'competitive analysis', 'battle cards', 'pricing comparison', 'who else is in this space', 'competitive moat'.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (competitive intelligence / competitive landscape analysis) with distinct, specific triggers and minimal overlap risk; the 'Works standalone — no prior startup-design session needed' note scopes it precisely within the startup skill family.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
ferdinandobons/startup-skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.