CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

multi-content-type-examples-custom-commands

How to author custom commands for the multi-content-type-examples CLI using the co-generated SDK.

58

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./seed/cli/multi-content-type-examples/.agents/skills/custom-commands/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, mostly executable guide that assumes Claude's competence and organizes content into clear sections, with only minor redundancy and limited breadth of worked examples.

Suggestions

De-duplicate the Key Patterns section or fold it into step 1 so client(ctx)/block_on are shown once.

Add one or two more worked command examples (and additional SDK client rows) so the common cases are more comprehensively covered.

Add an explicit validation checkpoint after `cargo build` (e.g. confirm the new subcommand appears in `--help`) to strengthen the workflow.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence, but the "Key Patterns" section re-shows the client(ctx) and block_on snippets already demonstrated in step 1, a minor redundancy that keeps it just below lean.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides fully executable, copy-paste Rust and shell commands, but only one worked example (clients-create) and a single SDK client row in the table, leaving minor coverage gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps are clearly sequenced (### 1, 2, 3) with a build-and-test step and a regeneration-safety table; since authoring commands is neither destructive nor batch, the cap does not apply, though explicit validation checkpoints are only implicit.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well organized into clearly headed sections with no nested references and no bundle files; the SDK-clients and regeneration tables are concise enough to stay inline, with only minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and clearly tied to a distinct CLI, giving it strong distinctiveness, but it only conveys a single action and omits any explicit "Use when..." trigger guidance.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when adding user-authored commands to the multi-content-type-examples CLI."

Broaden specificity by listing a couple of concrete capabilities (e.g. wiring authenticated SDK calls, registering clap subcommands) rather than the single "author custom commands" action.

Include natural synonyms users might say (e.g. "custom subcommands", "CLI extensions") to improve trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and a concrete action ("author custom commands" "using the co-generated SDK") but offers only a single action with no comprehensive coverage, matching the 1-2 concrete actions anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does ("How to author custom commands...") but lacks any "Use when..." trigger clause; per the rubric a missing explicit trigger caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant terms like "custom commands", "CLI", and "SDK" appear, but there are no natural synonyms or variations a user might say, fitting the "some relevant keywords but missing common variations" anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming the specific "multi-content-type-examples CLI" gives it a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal overlap with other skills, matching the clear-niche anchor.

5 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
fern-api/fern
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.