Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body presents a coherent, well-sequenced orchestration workflow with strong command syntax and explicit validation/recovery checkpoints. Its weaknesses are two large decorative ASCII diagrams that inflate token cost, pseudocode and un-invoked script listings that leave execution details implicit, and a References section pointing at two files that do not exist in the bundle.
Suggestions
Replace the ~80-line ASCII phase diagram and the multi-session diagram with a compact phase summary (a short list or table); the same information is already carried by the Commands and State Detection sections.
Add concrete invocation guidance: show how to run scripts such as scripts/master_orchestrator.py and scripts/session_detector.py (e.g., a working command line and expected arguments) instead of a bare file listing and the illustrative detect_state() pseudocode.
Fix the References section: either add the missing references/STATE-MACHINE.md and references/TROUBLESHOOTING.md files or remove those entries, and trim the inlined command details that duplicate references/COMMANDS.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Roughly 80 lines of ASCII box-drawing for the phase flow, plus a second multi-session diagram, restate information already conveyed compactly by the Commands, State Detection, and Skill Dependencies sections. The prose itself is tight, so this is trimmable padding rather than severe verbosity, matching anchor 3 rather than 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Command syntax, examples, the files table, and the config JSON are concrete, but detect_state() is illustrative pseudocode, the Scripts section lists files without any invocation example, and how the 16 sub-skills are actually engaged is never shown. This matches anchor 3 ('some concrete guidance but incomplete; pseudocode instead of executable code') rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four phases are clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints (TDD verify, handoff at 85% context, rollback on unrecoverable failure) and genuine feedback loops (retry with backoff, debug-fix-retry, rollback-skip-continue, error-to-solution storage). It falls short of anchor 5 because steps like checkpoint creation and the rollback command lack validation details. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized and references are clearly signaled, but two of the three cited reference files (references/STATE-MACHINE.md and references/TROUBLESHOOTING.md) are missing from the bundle, and the inlined command documentation duplicates content in references/COMMANDS.md. This fits anchor 3 ('could be better organized') rather than 4, since broken reference targets undermine navigation. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |