Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean body with executable Quick Start code, a clear workflow, and an appropriate split between overview content and bundle files. Its two real weaknesses are a missing referenced file (BROWSER-AUTOMATION.md) that breaks navigation, and the absence of an explicit failure-recovery feedback loop.
Suggestions
Fix the dangling reference: `references/BROWSER-AUTOMATION.md` is listed in the References section but does not exist in the bundle — either create the file or remove the entry so navigation works.
Add an explicit failure-recovery loop to the workflow (e.g., "If result.passed is false: inspect result.failures and screenshots, fix the feature, re-run tester.test_feature") so the EXECUTE/VERIFY phases close the loop instead of delegating recovery to the error-recoverer integration.
Replace the 28-line ASCII workflow box with a compact numbered list to save tokens without losing information, and add one line showing how to select a test framework (Playwright native vs. Puppeteer/Selenium adapter).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient: no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, terse sections, and every section carries information. The 28-line ASCII workflow box restates what a compact list would convey, which is minor padding that could be trimmed — keeping it below the 'every token earns its place' anchor but above anchor 3's 'unnecessary explanation'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Quick Start provides concrete, executable code ("tester = E2ETester(project_dir)", "await tester.test_feature('auth-001')") plus a complete acceptance-criteria JSON example, and all four listed scripts exist in the bundle. Minor gaps keep it from fully copy-paste coverage: no framework-selection guidance for the Playwright/Puppeteer/Selenium adapters and no setup or invocation-path notes. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The SETUP → EXECUTE → VERIFY → REPORT sequence is clearly laid out with verification steps ("Check expected outcomes", "Capture screenshots on failure") and failure handling in the Quick Start code. It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no explicit feedback loop (fix-and-retry) in the body — failure recovery is delegated to the "error-recoverer" integration point instead. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sectioning is good and references are one level deep with clear labels, but scored against the actual bundle: "references/BROWSER-AUTOMATION.md" is listed in the References section yet does not exist, so half the reference entries are dead ends. A broken reference path is a navigation failure beyond anchor 4's 'minor organization gaps', placing this between anchors 3 and 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |