Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and actionable as a planning methodology, but it is materially too long and self-repetitive, and it violates its own progressive-disclosure guidance both by inlining reference-grade material and by shipping broken bundle links. Tightening redundancy and fixing the missing files would materially raise the score.
Suggestions
Collapse the duplicated material: keep the detailed six-step workflow once and reduce Quick Start, the three Examples, and the Quick Reference section to brief pointers rather than re-deriving the decision tree, complexity table, and pattern summaries a second time.
Fix broken bundle links: either create references/complexity-assessment-guide.md, references/content-specification-guide.md, and templates/skill-plan-template.md, or update the "For More Information" and Planning Output links to point at the four reference files that actually exist.
Move the full Quick Reference tables and the three end-to-end examples into references/ so SKILL.md stays within the <1,200-line ideal it prescribes, leaving only the overview, step pointers, and quick-start essentials inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~1,330-line body restates the same material repeatedly — the 6-step workflow appears fully in Planning Workflow, again in Quick Start, again across three worked Examples, and again in the Quick Reference section (including a second copy of the decision tree and complexity tables) — well beyond the "some unnecessary explanation" of a 3. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete planning artifacts — a pattern-selection decision tree, a directory-structure template, an estimation formula with three worked examples, a dependency-documentation format, and real script commands — with only minor gaps where sections default to abstract prompting questions. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six steps are clearly sequenced with per-step Objectives, Outputs, and Examples plus a dedicated validation step with checklists, but validation is concentrated at the end rather than interleaved as explicit go/no-go gates between steps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are well-signaled with descriptive link text and four reference files plus plan-skill.py exist, but the SKILL.md itself is bloated with inline content (full Quick Reference, three complete examples) that the skill's own rules say belongs in references, and links to complexity-assessment-guide.md, content-specification-guide.md, and templates/skill-plan-template.md point at files/directories that do not exist. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |