Content
66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and workflow-clean — templates are copy-paste ready with explicit checkpoints and recovery guidance — but it is monolithic: duplicated phase templates across two full examples and no progressive disclosure into reference files make it expensive to load. Moving the worked examples and phase-detail templates into references/ would address both weak dimensions at once.
Suggestions
Move the two full example prompts (Security Audit, Technology Comparison) into references/example-prompts.md and keep a single condensed example inline, cutting the duplicated 5-phase structure.
Extract the per-phase template details (Phase 1-5 markdown blocks) into references/phase-templates.md, keeping only the phase overview table and completion checklist in SKILL.md.
Consolidate the Best Practices DO/DON'T lists into the existing Completeness/Quality checklists to remove repeated guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Noticeably verbose: the two full worked examples (~300 lines) re-enumerate the same 5-phase structure, success criteria, and deliverable templates already fully specified in the generic template section, and the Best Practices DO/DON'T lists repeat earlier checklist content. Above 1 because there is little conceptual over-explanation — the padding is duplicated template content, not tutoring on known concepts. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully copy-paste-ready: concrete markdown templates with exact fill-in slots, a worked input-to-output example pair, and an exact integration command ('/ralph-wiggum:ralph-loop ... --completion-promise ... --max-iterations 50') with recommended iteration ranges by task complexity. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 4-step generation sequence with per-phase success criteria, explicit checkpoints (DISCOVERY COMPLETE / ANALYSIS COMPLETE), final completeness and quality checklists, progress tracking format, and an 'If Stuck' recovery loop ('Do NOT skip analysis or output false promise'). This is a template-generation skill, not a destructive/batch operation, so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist at all; roughly 300 lines of worked example prompts that clearly belong in a separate references file are inlined in SKILL.md, leaving a monolithic 735-line body. Above 1 because the document itself has well-labeled section headers and a navigable structure — the failure is the absence of any file split, not chaotic nesting. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |