CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

supabase-api

Supabase JavaScript client API and REST API usage. Use when integrating Supabase, setting up clients, or using REST endpoints directly.

60

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/supabase-api/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is supabase-api in fernandezbaptiste/Skrillz

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, error-free quick reference whose examples are uniformly executable — the strongest dimension. It is weakened by inlining a large API catalog (much of it standard supabase-js knowledge Claude already has) in SKILL.md instead of moving bulk detail into the bundle's reference file, and by documenting destructive database operations without validation checkpoints or error-recovery loops.

Suggestions

Move the bulk of the REST curl catalog and the standard JavaScript client quick reference into references/ files (e.g., references/rest-api.md), keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with clearly signaled links, to improve both conciseness and progressive disclosure.

Trim the 'JavaScript Client Quick Reference' to only non-obvious patterns (e.g., QueryData typing, realtime channels) and drop API surface Claude already knows, such as basic signUp/signInWithPassword calls.

Add explicit validation steps to destructive operations — e.g., verify matching rows with a count/select before delete, check 'error' after every mutation, and show a fix-and-retry pattern keyed to the error-codes table — so workflow clarity can exceed the database-operations cap of 3.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is nearly prose-free and dense with code, but the 'JavaScript Client Quick Reference' section and the multiple client-init variants largely re-document the standard supabase-js API Claude already knows, and ~350 lines of catalog could be tightened — more than the 'minor instances' of the 4 anchor, though there is no padded conceptual explanation that would justify a 2.

3 / 5

Actionability

Every section is copy-paste executable: install command, client initialization variants, complete curl examples for select/insert/update/upsert/delete with required headers, a filter-operator table with syntax examples, an error-handling pattern, and a TypeScript type-generation command — fully covering the common cases per the 5 anchor.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sections imply a logical order (install → init → operate → handle errors), but the documented destructive database operations (delete, update, upsert, batch insert) have no integrated validation or verification steps — the delete example destructures 'error' without handling it, and the standalone Error Handling snippet forms no validate→fix→retry loop. Per the rubric's cap for database operations without feedback loops, workflow clarity is capped at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The single reference file (references/client-patterns.md) exists and is linked one level deep, but ~300 lines of full API reference are inlined in SKILL.md rather than split across reference files, and the lone reference link sits at the very bottom with a one-line annotation — matching the 3 anchor ('content that should be separate is inline') rather than the 4 anchor where most content is appropriately placed.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-formed description with an explicit and concrete 'Use when...' trigger clause anchored on a distinct niche keyword. Its main weakness is the what-side: it states the domain ('API usage') rather than enumerating concrete capabilities, leaving specificity and completeness just short of top marks.

Suggestions

Replace the nominal 'API and REST API usage' phrase with 3-4 concrete capability verbs, e.g., 'Query tables, manage auth, storage, and realtime subscriptions via the Supabase JavaScript client, or call REST endpoints directly with curl.'

Add common synonyms such as 'supabase-js' and 'Postgres' to the trigger clause so users who use those terms still match.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Supabase JavaScript client API and REST API usage') and includes two concrete actions ('setting up clients', 'using REST endpoints directly'), but 'usage' and 'integrating Supabase' are generic and capabilities like querying, auth, or storage are not enumerated — matching the anchor for 1-2 concrete actions without comprehensive coverage.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both parts are explicitly present: the what ('Supabase JavaScript client API and REST API usage') and a concrete when-clause ('Use when integrating Supabase, setting up clients, or using REST endpoints directly'). The when is at 5-level specificity, but the what is a nominal domain phrase without concrete capability actions, below the 5 anchor's example — so 4, not 3 (both what and when are explicit).

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user terms are well covered: 'Supabase', 'JavaScript client', 'REST API', 'REST endpoints'. A few natural variations are missing (e.g., 'supabase-js', 'Postgres'), which fits 'good keyword coverage; a few natural terms missing' rather than the comprehensive synonym coverage of a 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Supabase' is a clear niche keyword with distinct triggers and essentially no overlap risk with unrelated skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk' anchor.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
fernandezbaptiste/Skrillz
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.