CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

playground-project-architecture

Create an interactive HTML architecture explorer playground for the current project

56

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./playground-project-architecture/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with a complete, executable CONFIG schema and generation steps, but it is monolithic and repetitive, inlining reference-grade material that would benefit from separate files and deduplication. Adding a render/validation checkpoint would round out the workflow.

Suggestions

Move the full CONFIG schema, sequence-flow, and workflow-V2 reference material into separate files under references/ and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with one-level-deep links.

Consolidate the repeated message-id and componentData mandates into a single authoritative section to remove redundancy.

Add an explicit validation step (e.g., open the HTML and confirm diagrams render and that every selectable element has componentData) before declaring the task complete.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly technical and actionable, but the sequence-message-id warning and the componentData mandate are each repeated multiple times (CONFIG comments, dedicated sections, and Critical Rules), which could be tightened into a single authoritative statement.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides a complete CONFIG schema, concrete file-naming rules, and copy-paste-ready bash steps (mkdir, cp, open) that cover the common generation cases end to end.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear three-phase sequence with numbered generation steps and a Critical Rules checklist is present, but there is no explicit validation step confirming the generated HTML renders or that componentData coverage is complete before opening the browser.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Section headers give the document structure, but the large CONFIG schema, sequence-flow configuration, and workflow-V2 configuration are all inlined in one monolithic file with no split-out reference files, despite being reference-shaped material.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear, specific purpose but stops at one action and omits explicit trigger guidance, capping several dimensions at 3. Adding a "Use when..." clause and listing more concrete capabilities would lift specificity and completeness.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when exploring or documenting an unfamiliar codebase's architecture, onboarding, or planning architectural changes' clause to provide explicit trigger guidance.

Expand the action list to mention the concrete outputs (component tree, workflow/data-flow/file diagrams, component details panel) for greater specificity and trigger coverage.

Include natural synonyms users might say (e.g., 'visualize architecture', 'architecture diagram', 'codebase map') to improve trigger-term quality.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ("interactive HTML architecture explorer playground") and one concrete action ("Create"), but lists only a single action and omits the visualization/diagram capabilities, so it is not comprehensive.

3 / 5

Completeness

The description gives a clear "what" but contains no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant keywords like "architecture", "playground", and "project", but misses common natural variations or synonyms a user might say and lacks file-extension triggers.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The architecture-explorer-playground niche is mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against general HTML-generation or documentation skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
fernandezbaptiste/claude-playground-explorer
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.