CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

drawio-logical-diagrams

Creates professional logical flow diagrams and logical system architecture diagrams using draw.io XML format (.drawio files). Use when creating: (1) logical flow diagrams showing data/process flow between system components, (2) logical architecture diagrams representing system structure without cloud provider specifics, (3) BPMN process diagrams, (4) UML diagrams (class, sequence, activity), (5) data flow diagrams (DFD), (6) decision flowcharts, or (7) system interaction diagrams. This skill focuses on generic/abstract representations, not AWS/Azure-specific architectures (use aws-drawio-architecture-diagrams for cloud diagrams).

70

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable body with exact draw.io style strings, a color palette, complete XML examples, and real, well-signaled reference files. Its main weakness is token efficiency: the 'When to Use' section duplicates the description, generic process steps and ASCII art add little, and the inline shape/template material overlaps the reference bundle, which also holds progressive disclosure just below excellent.

Suggestions

Remove the 'When to Use' bullet list and the generic 'Creating a Logical Diagram' 8-step narration; keep only the concrete rules that follow (reserved IDs, grid alignment, escaping), since the frontmatter description already covers when to use the skill.

Move the two full worked XML examples into references/diagram-templates.md (which already exists for this purpose) and keep one short skeletal example inline, and drop the ASCII-art sketches of the three-tier and sequence diagrams in favor of the template links.

Trim the inline 'Generic Shapes and Styles', color palette, and 'Shape Examples' sections to a short summary table pointing to references/shape-styles.md, which already contains the full per-shape style strings and examples.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly useful draw.io-specific material (exact style strings, hex palette), but includes noticeable padding: the 'When to Use' bullet list restates the description's seven enumerated items almost verbatim, the '### Creating a Logical Diagram' steps are generic ('Analyze the request: Understand the system/process to diagram', 'Identify elements'), and large ASCII-art sketches plus two complete inline XML examples (~180 lines) inflate the token budget. This lands between anchors 2 and 3 but closer to 3 — most content is non-obvious reference data, though it could be tightened considerably.

3 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance: exact style strings ('rounded=1;whiteSpace=wrap;html=1;fillColor=#dae8fc;strokeColor=#6c8ebf;fontSize=12;'), a complete color palette table with hex fill/border values, full mxCell/mxGeometry snippets for every shape type, connector style strings, and two complete worked .drawio XML examples (order-processing flow, three-tier architecture). Specific examples cover the common cases, matching the level-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

An explicit 8-step sequence exists ('1. Analyze the request ... 7. Validate XML: Ensure all tags are closed and IDs are unique ... 8. Output: Write the .drawio file'), and a 'Constraints and Warnings' section enumerates failure modes (well-formedness, invalid parent references, negative coordinates). Validation is present so the XML-manipulation cap does not apply, but validation is manual prose with no concrete check command or fix-and-retry feedback loop, which keeps it below the level-5 anchor.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Two real, clearly signaled, one-level-deep references with purpose descriptions ('[shape-styles.md](references/shape-styles.md) - Complete shape and style reference', '[diagram-templates.md](references/diagram-templates.md) - Ready-to-use templates'), and Example 3 correctly defers to the templates file. However, the body inline-duplicates a substantial portion of what those files cover (shape/style tables and two full XML templates), which is more than the 'every token earns its place' split expected at level 5, but the structure and signaling are good enough to sit above level 3.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

An exemplary description: concrete 'what', explicit enumerated 'Use when creating (1)-(7)' triggers with synonyms and the .drawio file extension, and an explicit boundary against the cloud-architecture sibling skill. The only nitpick is mild buzzword padding ('professional') and some repetition of 'logical', neither of which affects any dimension materially.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('draw.io XML format (.drawio files)') and enumerates multiple concrete, specific actions/artifacts: '(1) logical flow diagrams showing data/process flow between system components, (2) logical architecture diagrams... (3) BPMN process diagrams, (4) UML diagrams (class, sequence, activity), (5) data flow diagrams (DFD), (6) decision flowcharts, or (7) system interaction diagrams'. This matches the level-5 anchor (multiple specific concrete actions, comprehensive coverage); it exceeds level 4 because there are no meaningful gaps in capability coverage. The only minor blemish is the mild buzzword 'professional', which does not reduce the concrete action list.

5 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: 'what' is stated concretely ('Creates professional logical flow diagrams and logical system architecture diagrams using draw.io XML format (.drawio files)') and 'when' is stated with a literal 'Use when creating:' clause followed by seven numbered concrete triggers. This is a direct match for the level-5 anchor; the 'when' is fully explicit rather than merely present as at level 4.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases a user would say are comprehensively covered with synonyms and file extensions: 'logical flow diagram', 'system architecture diagram', 'BPMN', 'UML', 'class, sequence, activity', 'data flow diagrams (DFD)', 'decision flowcharts', 'draw.io', and '.drawio files'. This matches the level-5 anchor ('comprehensive coverage of natural terms including synonyms and file extensions') and exceeds level 4, where a few natural terms would be missing.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description carves out a clear niche and explicitly disambiguates from the sibling skill: 'This skill focuses on generic/abstract representations, not AWS/Azure-specific architectures (use aws-drawio-architecture-diagrams for cloud diagrams)'. Clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk, matching the level-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (507 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository

fernandezbaptiste/developer-kit

Path

plugins/developer-kit-core/skills/drawio-logical-diagrams/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.