Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-sequenced instruction skill: exact file layout, unambiguous conventions, delegated architecture detail, and a validation command. The only meaningful gap is the absence of a recovery loop after `nuxi typecheck` fails and the lack of a small example showing the expected file shapes.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and imperative with zero padding: five numbered steps, exact file paths, and hard rules ("NO try/catch", "use $fetch"). It assumes Claude's competence and explains no concepts, matching the "every token earns its place" anchor; nothing can be trimmed without losing information. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: exact filenames ("types/[resource].types.ts"), conventions (snake_case vs camelCase), tool choice ($fetch), and a validation command ("nuxi typecheck"). Not a 5 because no example snippet of a types/contracts/adapter file is given, so the exact shape of the generated code is left to inference — a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear ordered sequence (read architecture docs → ask user for inputs → create four files in order → apply rules → validate with `nuxi typecheck`) with an explicit validation checkpoint. It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no feedback loop telling Claude what to do when typecheck fails (fix and re-run), and no checklist for the interactive step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At 27 lines with no bundle files, the skill needs no external references and is well organized into a single Steps section. It also correctly delegates detail one level deep to "docs/ARCHITECTURE.md sections 4.1-4.3" instead of inlining architecture rules, matching the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |