Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplarily lean, actionable instruction-only skill: exact file naming, ordering, project-specific constraints, and a validation step, with detail correctly deferred to the project's architecture doc. The only meaningful gaps are the absence of a concrete output example and an explicit error-recovery loop after validation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line is instructional — file paths, casing conventions, hard constraints, and one validation command — with zero explanation of concepts Claude already knows; only a near-duplicate mention of docs/ARCHITECTURE.md between the intro and step 1. This matches anchor 5: lean, assumes competence, every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths in creation order, exact user questions, specific decorators (@Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' })), and an executable command (npx tsc --noEmit), but no example of the output files — patterns are deferred to an external doc and "correct types" is left vague. Anchor 4: mostly executable guidance with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence with ordered sub-steps (a–d), a user-input checkpoint in step 2, and a final validation step (npx tsc --noEmit). It lacks an explicit error-recovery loop ("if tsc fails, fix and re-validate"), so it matches anchor 4 rather than anchor 5; validation is present, so the batch-operation cap of 3 does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and well organized under a ## Steps section, with its only reference (docs/ARCHITECTURE.md sections 4.1-4.3) one level deep and precisely signaled with section names. Per the simple-skill guideline, this earns a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |