Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured instruction set with an executable structure-mapping command and a concrete output template; it respects token budget and assumes Claude's competence. Its only weakness is that the endpoint-discovery step ("grep in services") is a hint rather than an executable command or path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~35-line body is lean with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the data-flow diagram and Pinia/Vue Query state split are project-specific knowledge that earns their tokens. This matches anchor 5 — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | One fully executable command ("find src/modules/$ARGUMENTS -type f | head -40") plus a concrete output template with defined sections is mostly executable guidance. However, "List the consumed endpoints (grep in services)" is a hint without a command or path, leaving minor gaps that keep it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three steps (map structure, summarize in a defined format, output) are clearly sequenced with an unambiguous deliverable, and the read-only task needs no validation checkpoints. The vague "grep in services" mechanics and no guidance for a missing module path leave minor gaps fitting anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references (none exist in the bundle), and is well organized with a Steps section and clearly labeled output subsections. Per the simple-skill guideline, this earns anchor 5 on organization alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |