Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean, priority-ordered instruction sheet with concrete fix mappings and an explicit validation command after each fix. The only gaps are minor: a few vague fix directives and the absence of an explicit feedback loop for when validation fails.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~35-line body is lean and directive with zero padding — no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, just the fix mappings, priority tiers, and one validation command. Every token earns its place, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Most guidance is concrete and executable: specific violation→fix mappings ('try/catch in services -> remove, move error handling to hook (onError)'), named companion skills, and a copy-paste validation command. Not 5 because a few directives are vague ('any types -> type correctly', 'Components > 200 lines -> decompose') without pointing to how or a reference. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 4-step sequence (find → fix in priority order → validate after each fix with an explicit command → report) with an explicit validation checkpoint, so the batch-operation cap at 3 does not apply. Not 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop stating what to do when the tsc/build/vitest validation fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and needs none; the body is well-organized into steps and priority tiers, and '/review-check-architecture' and '/migration-migrate-component' are clearly-signaled skill invocations rather than buried file references. This matches the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |