Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean, actionable fix catalog with a prioritized checklist and an executable validation command after each fix. Its only weaknesses are a few underspecified remediations and the absence of an explicit validate-fail-retry loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line is a directive, a violation-to-fix mapping, or an executable command; there is no explanation of concepts Claude already knows and no padding, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The body provides concrete violation-to-fix mappings ("try/catch in services -> remove, move error handling to hook or Server Action") and a copy-paste validation command, but a few remediations are directional rather than executable ("Components > 200 lines -> decompose", "any types -> type correctly"). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence with explicit validation after each fix and a prioritized fix checklist; however, the error-recovery loop (what to do when the validation command fails) is not stated, which matters for this batch code-modification workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, and it is organized into clear steps and priority tiers, which merits a top score under the simple-skill guideline. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |