Conciseness

Every line is a terse, actionable directive ('try/catch in services -> remove, move error handling to component/interceptor', 'Console.log -> remove') with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor.

Actionability

The body provides a copy-paste validation command ('npx tsc --noEmit && ng build && ng test --watch=false'), a specific remedy for each violation type, and delegates complex migrations to named companion skills ('/migration-migrate-component'). It stops short of anchor 5 because a few remedies are thin (e.g. 'any types -> type correctly') and no file-discovery guidance is given for the module.

Workflow Clarity

The four-step sequence (find violations -> fix in priority order -> validate after each fix -> report) is clear with explicit validation checkpoints, matching anchor 4. It is not anchor 5 because there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop for what to do when the validation command fails.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external reference files (none exist in the bundle), and its content is well-organized into a Steps section with clearly labeled Critical/Important/Improvements priority tiers — per the rubric's simple-skill guideline this earns a 5.

Specificity

The description names the domain ('architecture violations') and one concrete action ('automated fixing' with a 'by priority' mechanism), which matches the anchor for naming a domain with 1-2 concrete actions but not comprehensive coverage; it does not reach anchor 4 because only a single action is stated.

Completeness

Both parts are explicit: what ('need automated fixing by priority') and when ('Use when architecture violations were found'). It matches anchor 4 rather than 5 because the 'when' clause could be more specific about the module or project context.

Trigger Term Quality

'architecture violations', 'found', and 'fixing' are natural phrases a user would say when needing this skill, giving good keyword coverage; it falls short of anchor 5 because synonyms like 'architectural issues', 'fix violations', or 'ARCHITECTURE.md' are missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'architecture violations' is a distinct niche trigger that clearly separates this from unrelated skills, with only minor overlap risk against closely related lint-fix or refactor skills; it does not reach 5 because the description omits the concrete domain (Angular, docs/ARCHITECTURE.md) that would make it fully unambiguous.