Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable routing skill with clear sequencing, real validation feedback loops, and excellent progressive disclosure via verified one-level references. The only weakness is mild verbosity in the context-gathering section and some repeated cross-references.
Suggestions
Tighten Step 4 ('Garbage in, garbage out'): collapse the bulleted source list into a shorter inline form or move the longer enumeration into a reference file, keeping only the 'don't hallucinate / flag gaps' rule inline.
Consolidate the repeated hybrid-workflow pointer (Steps 3.7, 3.8, 5, and 7) so it is introduced once in Step 5 and merely referenced by short link elsewhere, reducing token cost.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of explanations Claude already knows, but Step 4's context-gathering source list runs long and the hybrid-workflow pointer is repeated across Steps 3, 5, and 7 — minor instances that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: a routing table mapping intent to type and reference file, exact universal constraints with syntax examples (A["Process (main)"], -->|"O(1) lookup"|), a reserved-words list, and explicit Step 6 tool parameters with required/optional distinction. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with explicit feedback loops (2-attempt regeneration cap, 'stop and ask what's wrong') and pre-generation validation (asking focused questions when context is thin). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A lean overview that routes to one-level-deep, clearly-signaled reference files (architecture, flowchart, sequence, erd, state, gantt, workflow — all verified present), with per-type detail correctly split out of SKILL.md. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |