Conciseness

Lean and prescriptive — no tutorial padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows — but the batching/validation cadence rules appear nearly verbatim in both §1 ("Use structural evidence returned by writes... Take one visual review per coherent composition phase and one post-fix screenshot only after a targeted visual fix") and §3 rule 12, and the scope-guard/stop guidance is restated across §1 and §2. Between anchors 3 and 4, noticeably above the midpoint: the redundancy is duplication of operational rules rather than unnecessary explanation.

Actionability

Fully executable specifics throughout: exact code syntax format `var(--color-bg-primary)`, scope constants (`FRAME_FILL, SHAPE_FILL`, `TEXT_FILL`, `GAP`, `CORNER_RADIUS`), copy-paste lookup expressions (`getLocalTextStyles().find(s => s.name === name)`, `figma.variables.getVariableByIdAsync(id)`), a concrete state-file path, a ledger JSON example, real `get_libraries`/`search_design_system` call signatures with parameter shapes, and a table mapping 8 real helper scripts to purposes. Matches anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

Each of the four scopes has a numbered step sequence with explicit validation steps ("Validate counts, mode values, aliases, scopes, syntax, styles"), a pre-mutation scope-and-acceptance checklist, a Definition of Done checklist, idempotency checks, a resume protocol, and feedback loops ("If a required acceptance check fails, fix the scoped defect before continuing", targeted-retry splits, the `safeToRetryWithoutCanvasRead` anti-pattern). Matches anchor 5 including checklists and error-recovery loops.

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a navigation-ready overview: §10 gives a "Load when" table for all 7 references and §11 a purpose table for all 8 scripts — every referenced path exists in the bundle, references are one level deep, and the body explicitly instructs loading references on demand ("Read references on demand; do not infer their contents from the filename"; "Load only references needed for the selected path"). Matches anchor 5.

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions with comprehensive domain coverage: "Build or update a professional-grade design system in Figma from a codebase", "create variables/tokens, build component libraries, create individual components with proper variant sets and variable bindings, set up theming (light/dark modes), document foundations, or reconcile gaps between code and Figma". Anchor 5 fits; anchor 4 ("minor gaps in coverage") understates the breadth of concrete actions named.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what ("Build or update a professional-grade design system in Figma from a codebase") and when (two "Use when..." clauses with concrete trigger phrases, including the any-single-component case). Matches anchor 5's structure exactly; anchor 4's caveat about 'when' being less explicit does not apply. Third-person voice throughout — no voice penalty.

Trigger Term Quality

Covers the natural phrases users would say: "design system in Figma", "component libraries", "variables/tokens", "theming (light/dark modes)", "reconcile gaps between code and Figma", and "create or generate any component in Figma — even a single one" (a create/generate synonym pair plus the single-component edge case). Anchor 5 applies; synonyms and common variations are present.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (Figma design-system construction) with a distinct trigger vocabulary. It explicitly delineates from its closest sibling: "it complements the `figma-use` skill which teaches HOW to call the Plugin API" — and the deliberate broad trigger for any Figma component is resolved by instructing both skills load together, so overlap with figma-use is intended complementarity, not conflict.