mflux-dev-env

Set up and work in the mflux dev environment (arm64 expectation, uv, justfile recipes, lint/format/test).

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.cursor/skills/mflux-dev-env/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with copy-paste-ready justfile/uv commands and well-organized sections appropriate for a small single-purpose skill. The only real gap is a missing explicit validation checkpoint in the ty rule burn-down loop.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation checkpoint to the burn-down loop, e.g. 'After fixing, run `just typecheck` and only commit once it reports clean.'

Tighten the 'Planned burn-down' paragraph into a short imperative checklist to trim minor verbosity.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and assumes Claude knows uv/just/ty, but the 'Type checking (ty)' burn-down paragraph ('we intend to re-enable these rules piecemeal — delete one ignore line, fix all resulting ... commit, repeat') could be tightened slightly, fitting 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation'.	4 / 5
Actionability	Copy-paste-ready commands throughout ('just install', 'just lint', 'uv run ...', 'just typecheck', 'MFLUX_PRESERVE_TEST_OUTPUT=1', 'brew install just') covering the common cases, matching 'fully executable; copy-paste ready'.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The command reference is clear and the ty burn-down is sequenced ('delete one ignore line, fix ... commit, repeat'), but it lacks an explicit validation checkpoint (e.g. confirm `ty check` is clean before committing), fitting 'clear sequence with most checkpoints; minor validation gaps'.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Under 50 lines with no external references needed and well-organized sections (When to Use, Instructions, Type checking), which per the rubric's simple-skill guidance earns a 5 on progressive disclosure.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinctive for the mflux niche with good keyword coverage, but it lacks any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance, which caps its completeness. Adding a 'Use when ...' clause would raise both completeness and distinctiveness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when setting up or working in the mflux repo, or when running lint/format/build/test tasks.'

Include the other canonical commands referenced in the body (build, typecheck/ty) so trigger terms match the full recipe set.

Consider adding the file extension or tool synonyms a user might naturally say (e.g. '.toml', 'pre-commit', 'ty') to broaden natural keyword coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ('mflux dev environment') and several concrete items ('arm64 expectation, uv, justfile recipes, lint/format/test'), matching the 'lists several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor rather than the fully comprehensive 5.	4 / 5
Completeness	The 'what' is clear ('Set up and work in the mflux dev environment ...') but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Good coverage of natural domain terms a contributor would say ('uv', 'justfile recipes', 'lint/format/test', 'arm64'), but misses synonyms also used in the body ('build', 'typecheck', 'ty').	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 'mflux' niche is distinctive with low conflict risk, but without explicit triggers it could still overlap with generic uv/justfile dev-environment skills, fitting 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk'.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: filipstrand/mflux
Path: .cursor/skills/mflux-dev-env/SKILL.md
Commit: 1430b27

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.