Content
60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, sequenced architecture workflow with explicit validation and recovery steps, leaning appropriately on referenced resource files. Its main weaknesses are moderate redundancy and deferred output templates/examples that are not bundled, which limits in-body actionability.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the References section (remove the repeated narrative + bullet listing) and consolidate overlapping 'When to use', 'Intent signature', and 'Control-flow features' wording to tighten conciseness.
Inline a minimal ADR/output template or one concrete example so the skill is actionable without requiring the unbundled `resources/output-templates.md`.
Either bundle the referenced `resources/*.md` and `../_shared/core/*.md` files or note they are external, so progressive disclosure navigates to real materials.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's architectural knowledge (no padding explaining ATAM/CBAM), but contains redundancy such as the References section listing resources twice (narrative + bullet list) and overlapping 'When to use'/'Intent signature'/'Control-flow features' content, fitting the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor rather than the 4 anchor's only minor trims. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete process (named modes, transitions, guardrails, an `rg` search snippet), but the actual artifact templates and examples are deferred to unbundled `resources/*.md` files, leaving the in-body guidance with key output details missing; this matches the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor rather than the 4 anchor's mostly-executable guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is present (Entry -> Scenes PREPARE/ACQUIRE/REASON/VERIFY/FINALIZE -> Transitions -> Failure and recovery -> Exit) with an explicit VERIFY checkpoint and recovery feedback loops, fitting the 'clear sequence with most checkpoints' anchor; it is not a 5 because the checklist for this complex process is referenced externally rather than embedded. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well organized into signaled sections with one-level-deep references to `resources/*.md` and `../_shared/core/*.md`, matching the 'good structure; references mostly clear' anchor; the minor gap is the double-listed References section and that referenced files are not actually bundled here. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |