Conciseness

The body explains nothing Claude already knows and uses compact tables, but the same workflow is restated four times (Entry steps, the PREPARE scene, the Actions table, and the canonical command path) with intent and framework details repeated across sections; this fits anchor 3 ("mostly efficient but could be tightened") rather than anchor 4 because the cross-section duplication goes beyond minor trimming.

Actionability

Commands are concrete throughout ("oma market detect-trap \"$TOPIC\"", "oma market resolve --json", exit codes, "--emit=compact", 5-minute timeout, exact output paths), but the canonical command path contains an undefined "$QUERY_PLAN_FILE" and an ellipsis comment for upstream steps; this matches anchor 4 ("mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps") rather than 5 because the example is not fully self-contained.

Workflow Clarity

The sequence is explicit (numbered Entry and Scenes) with validation gates up front (detect-trap exit 2/REFUSE, "oma market resolve" ok check), a self-check before writing the brief, a dedicated failure-and-recovery section covering each failure mode verbatim ("report stderr verbatim"), and defined exit criteria, matching the anchor for explicit validation with error-recovery feedback loops.

Progressive Disclosure

The References section signals every resource with its purpose at one level deep ("load only the selected framework") and the body points to them at the right moments, but framework auto-toggle and intent-routing detail is duplicated inline and the referenced "resources/" files are not present in the bundle to verify; this matches anchor 4 ("good structure; references mostly clear; minor organization gaps") rather than 5 because of the inline duplication and unverifiable reference targets.

Specificity

"Research customer pain points, trends, and competitors" names the domain and three research targets but relies on a single generic verb with no concrete mechanism or output actions, matching the anchor for naming a domain with 1-2 concrete actions rather than the several distinct action verbs of anchor 4.

Completeness

Both what ("Research customer pain points, trends, and competitors through the OMA market engine") and when ("Use for market discovery or voice-of-customer analysis") are explicit, but the when-clause omits the trend and competitor scenarios the what-clause names and lacks concrete trigger phrases, so it falls short of anchor 5.

Trigger Term Quality

"customer pain points", "trends", "competitors", "market discovery", and "voice-of-customer" are phrases users would naturally say, but common synonyms such as "market research", "competitive analysis", or "user complaints" are absent, fitting the good-but-incomplete keyword coverage of anchor 4.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche of community-signal market research through a specific engine is distinct with targeted triggers (pain points, voice-of-customer, market discovery), though it carries minor overlap risk with general research or web-search skills, matching anchor 4.