Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered operational skill: executable command paths, an explicit scene/transition workflow with validation and comprehensive failure recovery, and disciplined deferral of detail to a protocol file. Its main weakness is token overhead from schema scaffolding (SSL primitives, resource scopes, scene labels) that adds structure without actionable value.
Suggestions
Remove or collapse the meta-scaffolding sections ("Logical Operations" SSL-primitive table, "Resource scope" table, "Scenes" labels, "Intent signature") — they restate the workflow in abstract vocabulary Claude does not need, and would cut a large fraction of tokens.
Consolidate the Dependencies, Canonical command path, and Failure/recovery sections so each command and failure mode appears once instead of 2-3 times.
Give each References entry a one-line description of what it contains so navigation to the protocol/shared files is self-explanatory, and verify resources/execution-protocol.md ships alongside the skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is operational rather than conceptual (no re-explanation of what a PDF is), but carries substantial non-actionable scaffolding — the "SSL primitive" action table, "Resource scope" table (LOCAL_FS/PROCESS/MEMORY/OTHER), "Scenes" labels, and "Intent signature" — that adds tokens without guidance value, and dependency/command information is repeated across sections. It fits the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor, not level 4, because whole sections could be cut without losing actionable content. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, runnable commands are given for the probe, standard conversion, mdformat, and the hybrid OCR path, plus specific retry flags (--use-struct-tree, --table-method cluster, --markdown-with-html, --ocr-lang "ko,en") and a concrete failure/recovery table. It stops short of level 5 because commands use placeholders ({input_path}, {languages}) rather than a worked example, and common-case flag usage is deferred to resources/execution-protocol.md. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The flow is explicitly sequenced (Entry → PREPARE/ACQUIRE/ACT/VERIFY/FINALIZE → Exit) with a text-layer probe as a validation checkpoint, explicit decision branches in Transitions, a dedicated VERIFY scene, and a failure/recovery table with feedback loops (garbled output → retry tagged/hybrid; missing tables → retry cluster method; OCR mismatch → retry with explicit languages). This matches the level-5 anchor with explicit validation and error-recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Detail is deliberately deferred to one-level-deep references (guardrail: "Keep detailed command sequences in resources/execution-protocol.md rather than duplicating every variant here") and a References section lists the four targets clearly. It is not level 5 because the reference entries are bare paths with minimal signaling of their contents, two references point outside the skill directory (../_shared/core/...), and no bundle files were provided to verify the referenced paths exist. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |