Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with a well-sequenced, validated workflow and executable code. The main weakness is progressive disclosure: the output-format reference path is inconsistent with the bundle layout and the referenced file is absent.
Suggestions
Create the referenced output-format templates file, or place it under references/ and update the body paths (e.g. references/output-formats.md) so the reference resolves.
Dedupe the canonical command path and Guardrails against the Process section to trim redundant tokens.
Reconcile every path mention of 'resources/' with the actual bundle directory name to keep navigation consistent.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely efficient and assumes Claude's competence (no basic-concept padding), though the canonical command path and Guardrails restate content from the Process and Scenes sections and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands (oma recap --date/--window/--tool --json) and a complete executable jq fallback script with concrete example output paths covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear PREPARE→ACQUIRE→REASON→ACT→VERIFY→FINALIZE sequence with an explicit VERIFY checkpoint requiring direct evidence for completion claims, plus a failure-and-recovery section forming a feedback loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body references 'resources/output-formats.md' as a one-level-deep detail file, but the referenced directory is 'resources/' rather than the conventional 'references/' and no such bundle file exists, so the navigation signal points to a missing target. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |