Conciseness

The ~430-line body contains several padded, redundant sections — 'Scheduling', 'Structural Flow' (Scenes PREPARE/ACQUIRE/REASON/ACT/VERIFY/FINALIZE), and 'Logical Operations' (SSL primitives table) largely restate the Translation Method stages — and explains concepts Claude already knows (e.g., 'EN → KO: SVO → SOV, move verb to end'). It also cites time-sensitive sources ('Empirical evidence (Slator 2024, Self-Refine paper)') without a deprecation context. This matches the 'noticeably verbose; several unnecessary explanations or padded sections' anchor, not 3, because the duplication is structural rather than a few trimmable sentences.

Actionability

Concrete, executable guidance dominates: the mechanical checks ('search the draft output for `—`. Every occurrence must be replaced...'), persona/voice tables keyed to a real config field (`translation_voice` from `.agents/oma-config.yaml`), output format templates, a troubleshooting table, and a runnable `rg "<source-key-or-term>" .` command. It falls short of 5 because most instruction is procedural prose with only one actual command and no worked end-to-end example showing input → verified output.

Workflow Clarity

Stages 1–7 are explicitly sequenced with a mandatory, blocking 'Verification Gate' ('do not emit output until every item is confirmed'), explicit revise-and-rerun feedback loops ('If any mechanical check fails, revise and re-run'), and batch-specific validation ('batch size greater than 10 strings, verification is mandatory'). This matches the top anchor including error-recovery loops, and the batch-operation cap does not apply since validation is present.

Progressive Disclosure

References are one level deep and clearly listed ('Translation rubric: `resources/translation-rubric.md` — 5-criterion scoring...'), but the referenced files (`resources/translation-rubric.md`, `resources/anti-ai-patterns.md`, `../_shared/core/*`) do not exist in the bundle, and substantial content that belongs in those files (rubric questions, anti-AI pattern lists, translator's-note guidelines) is duplicated inline. This fits 'some structure but could be better organized; content that should be separate is inline' rather than 4, since the navigation promise cannot be fulfilled within the bundle as shipped.

Specificity

The description names the domain and a couple of concrete behaviors — 'preserves tone, style, and natural word order' and 'Infers register, domain, and style' — but these are abstract capabilities rather than a list of specific actions, and coverage is incomplete (glossary creation, translation review, and batch i18n handling from the body are absent). This matches 'Names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive' rather than 4, which requires several discrete specific actions.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: what ('Context-aware translation that preserves tone, style, and natural word order... Infers register, domain, and style') and when, via a concrete 'Use when translating UI strings, documentation, marketing copy, or any multilingual content' clause with specific trigger phrases. Not 4 because the when-clause is fully explicit with concrete triggers rather than merely serviceable.

Trigger Term Quality

Trigger phrases 'UI strings, documentation, marketing copy, or any multilingual content' are natural terms a user would say, giving good keyword coverage. It falls short of the comprehensive anchor because common synonyms and variants are missing — 'localize', 'l10n', 'i18n files', and specific locale mentions users frequently use.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Translation/localization is a clear niche with distinct triggers ('translating UI strings, marketing copy, multilingual content') and minimal conflict risk against typical neighboring skills (dev-workflow boundaries are even drawn in the body). The trailing 'or any multilingual content' slightly broadens scope but stays within the same niche, so it does not drop to 4.