Content
41%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is maximally lean but essentially content-free: it conveys no actionable guidance, no workflow, and no real capability information. It is appropriate only as a minimal test fixture, not as a functional skill body.
Suggestions
Add at least one concrete, executable instruction or code example so the body is actionable.
If the skill performs a multi-step or risky operation, include a sequenced workflow with a validation checkpoint.
Replace the placeholder line with guidance that tells Claude what to actually do when this skill is invoked.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a single heading and one short line with no padding or over-explanation; every token is lean and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The body provides no concrete code, commands, or steps; "a small skill body used for testing" only describes rather than instructs. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no sequence of steps and no single unambiguous action to perform, so no workflow or validation checkpoints exist. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a sub-50-line fixture with no need for external references, the single heading provides reasonable organization, though it stops short of the well-organized multi-section structure that would warrant a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |