Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable verification skill with executable commands and a complete inline script. Its only gap is workflow clarity: the build step has a validation loop, but the manual post-build checks stop at reporting rather than closing a fix-and-retry loop.
Suggestions
Add an explicit fix-and-retry checkpoint after the broken-image and reST checks (e.g., 'If any are listed, fix the source reference/image and re-run yarn build, then re-check').
Frame the three checks as a single ordered checklist with a clear 'build first, then run these checks' preamble so the overall sequence is unambiguous.
Optionally move the inline broken-image Python script into a scripts/ file and reference it, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout — terse section intros like 'Full production build (includes broken link detection):' followed directly by commands, with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the inline Python script is complete and necessary rather than padded. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance: 'nvm use 20', 'cd website && yarn build', a complete Python script for broken-image detection, and a concrete grep command for unresolved reST roles. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequencing is present ('Run this after yarn build') and the build has a built-in fail-on-broken-links feedback loop, but the post-build broken-image and reST checks only report results without an explicit fix-then-recheck checkpoint, leaving checkpoints implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files are present and none are needed; the body is a compact, well-organized set of sections (Prerequisites, Build, three Check sections), which per the simple-skill note earns a full score without external references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |