Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and clearly sequenced with a verification checklist, and it is well organized with shallow references. Its only weakness is mild repetition of the website/static/docs copy prohibition, which slightly undercuts token efficiency.
Suggestions
Consolidate the "do not copy generated assets into website/static/docs/test-images/" guidance into a single Docs Update Rules bullet and reference it from the workflow instead of restating it three times.
Trim near-duplicate naming bullets in the Naming section (e.g., the static-screenshot examples repeat `popup_open`/`checked_item_reopened` already covered by the general screenshot-name guidance).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (no concept explanations), but the prohibition on copying assets into website/static/docs/test-images/ is restated in workflow step 7, Docs Update Rules, and the closing caveat, so not every token earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-ready guidance is given throughout: `page.enable_screenshots = True`, `pump_and_settle()`, `assert_screenshot(...)`, `create_gif([...], "<flow_name>", duration=...)`, plus specific frontMatter fields and golden paths. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 7-step workflow is paired with a Verification Checklist that acts as explicit validation checkpoints (asset exists at implied path, docs point to generated location, obsolete media removed), providing the required feedback loop. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, but the body is well organized into focused sections with a one-level References list pointing at repo paths; per the simple-skill note, well-organized sections without nested references warrant a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |