Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, highly actionable Go dev-loop skill with executable commands and clear sequencing. The only gap is an explicit feedback loop for test failures.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop after the test step, e.g. 'If tests fail: fix, re-run go test -race on affected packages, only proceed when green.'
Clarify the verification checkpoint in 'When changing code' — make 'tests pass' an explicit gate before moving to the next step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: copy-paste commands in tight blocks, no concept-explanation padding, every line earns its place assuming Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (gofmt -w ., go vet ./..., go test -v -race .../..., make test) covering focused and full-suite cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 'When changing code' gives a clear numbered sequence with concrete commands and conditional branches, but lacks an explicit test-failure feedback loop (fail → fix → re-run). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and clearly signaled one-level references (AGENTS.md, related skills), satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |