Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean orchestrator page: concise, well-sequenced routing with an explicit stop-on-failure escalation rule. Its effectiveness is undermined, however, by the fact that every file it dispatches to is missing from the bundle, leaving the skill non-executable as delivered despite its clean structure.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files (commands/*.md, skills/controller.md, skills/unattended.md, guidelines.md) alongside SKILL.md, or inline the minimal content needed for each dispatch path so the skill is executable as delivered.
Add a fallback for missing dispatch targets (e.g., "if commands/{command}.md does not exist, list the available phases and ask the user") so routing does not dead-end when a file is absent.
State where the command and skill files live relative to the skill root (or verify the paths resolve after installation) so the progressive-disclosure pointers are guaranteed to be navigable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 15-line body is lean and dense: numbered dispatch steps, a failure-handling rule, and one pointer — no explanation of concepts Claude already knows and nothing to trim. Matches the "every token earns its place" anchor; not 4 because there are no instances of over-explanation at all. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Routing guidance is concrete and conditional ("read `commands/{command}.md` and follow it", "If the user provided a bug report or issue URL, execute the `/assess` phase"), but every actionable path terminates in a file (commands/, skills/controller.md, skills/unattended.md, guidelines.md) that is not shipped in the skill bundle, so the instructions cannot actually be executed. Not 4: missing the entire referenced bundle is more than a minor gap; not 2: the dispatch logic itself is specific and well-structured. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 1-2-3 sequence with explicit branch conditions and an explicit validation checkpoint with recovery options ("If a step fails or produces unexpected output, stop and report the error to the user. Do not advance to the next phase. Offer to retry the failed step or escalate."). Not 5: the underlying phase-by-phase workflow and its validation are delegated to unshipped files, so only the routing layer is specified here; not 3: a stop-on-failure checkpoint with escalation is explicitly present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The structure is right — one-level-deep pointers, each clearly signaled with its purpose ("For principles, hard limits, safety, quality, and escalation rules, see `guidelines.md`") — but scored against the actual bundle, none of the referenced files (commands/{command}.md, skills/unattended.md, skills/controller.md, guidelines.md) exist, so the navigation is unresolvable as shipped. Not 4: broken reference targets are more than a minor organization gap; not 2: nothing is wrongly inlined and references are prominently, not buriedly, signaled. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |