flox-sharing
Sharing and composing Flox environments. Use for environment composition, remote environments, FloxHub, and team collaboration patterns.
63
73%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./flox-plugin/skills/flox-sharing/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
75%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description adequately identifies its niche and provides explicit trigger guidance, making it strong on completeness and distinctiveness. However, it lacks concrete action verbs describing specific capabilities (e.g., pushing, pulling, merging environments) and could include more natural user-facing trigger terms to improve discoverability.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions like 'push environments to FloxHub, pull remote environments, merge environment layers, set up shared team environments'.
Include more natural trigger terms users might say, such as 'share my Flox environment', 'pull from FloxHub', 'collaborate on dev environment', or 'compose environment layers'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Flox environments) and mentions some actions like 'sharing', 'composing', and 'composition', but doesn't list concrete specific actions (e.g., 'push environments to FloxHub', 'pull remote environments', 'merge environment configurations'). | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (sharing and composing Flox environments) and 'when' (explicitly states 'Use for environment composition, remote environments, FloxHub, and team collaboration patterns'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant keywords like 'FloxHub', 'environment composition', 'remote environments', and 'team collaboration', but misses natural user phrases like 'share my environment', 'push to FloxHub', 'pull environment', or 'collaborate on Flox'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The combination of 'Flox environments', 'FloxHub', and 'environment composition' creates a very specific niche that is unlikely to conflict with other skills. The domain is narrow and well-defined. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid, well-structured skill with excellent actionability through concrete TOML and bash examples covering multiple real-world patterns. Its main weaknesses are moderate verbosity (some concepts are repeated or over-explained) and missing explicit validation steps in multi-step workflows like environment composition and FloxHub pushing. The progressive disclosure and cross-referencing to related skills is well done.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints to composition workflows, e.g., 'After adding [include], run `flox activate` to verify no conflicts before pushing'
Trim redundant explanations—the dev vs runtime distinction and sharing vs publishing distinction are each explained 2-3 times; consolidate to one clear statement each
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly well-organized but includes some redundant explanations (e.g., the distinction between sharing and publishing is repeated multiple times, the dev vs runtime pattern is explained at length with commentary Claude could infer). Some sections like 'Understanding Environment Sharing' explain concepts that could be more terse. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete, executable TOML configurations and bash commands throughout. Examples are copy-paste ready with realistic values, and patterns like the postgres service definition and team composition examples are fully specified and actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | While individual operations are clear, multi-step workflows like pushing to FloxHub or composing environments lack explicit validation checkpoints. The troubleshooting section mentions testing standalone but doesn't integrate validation into the composition workflow itself. The 'Creating Composition-Optimized Environments' section mentions testing but doesn't provide a clear validate-fix-retry loop. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is well-structured with clear sections progressing from core concepts to advanced patterns. Cross-references to related skills (flox-environments, flox-publish, flox-services) are clearly signaled and one level deep. Content is appropriately scoped to sharing and composition without inlining unrelated material. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- flox/flox-agentic
- Commit
5f851be
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.