Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and highly actionable, with executable commands and Dart examples plus a numbered failing-run workflow and checklist. Progressive disclosure is well handled through clearly signaled one-level references.
Suggestions
Make the failing-run validation loop explicit: state "fix the violations, then re-run; only stop when the run is clean" as a named feedback loop rather than a single re-run step.
Briefly note which invocation mode is preferred when dart_skills_lint is already a pubspec dependency versus globally activated, so Claude does not have to guess.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: assumes Claude's competence with no padding about what a linter is, and deliberately defers the full flag list to --help "so it never goes stale." | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands for all three invocation modes plus a complete, executable Dart rule class and test harness covering the common custom-rule case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The failing-run workflow is numbered with a re-run verification checkpoint and a task-progress checklist, plus a --dry-run preview path; minor gap is that the validation feedback loop is stated implicitly rather than as an explicit fix-then-revalidate cycle. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to the setup skill, RULES.md, and README.md; the bulk rule reference is appropriately split out rather than inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |