Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a highly actionable, well-organized style-ruleset with concrete Bad/Good examples throughout, though it leans long for a single file and does not define a sequenced application workflow or split its reference lists into separate files. It earns its place largely on actionability.
Suggestions
Add a short apply-the-rules workflow (e.g. 1. Draft, 2. Scan against the banned list, 3. Check puffery/false-range/rule-of-three, 4. Final pass) to raise workflow clarity.
Move the banned-word and banned-phrase lists into a references file (e.g. BANNED.md) and keep SKILL.md as an overview that links to it, improving progressive disclosure.
Trim the opening paragraph and redundant rationales so every remaining token earns its place.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly tight, using Bad/Good pairs rather than long explanations, but the introductory paragraph and occasional restated rationales add padding that keeps it just short of the lean level-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Every rule is backed by concrete, specific guidance—explicit banned-word lists and copy-able Bad/Good example pairs—making the instruction-only skill highly actionable without needing code. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Rules are organized into six numbered sections, but there is no sequenced process or validation checkpoint for applying them (e.g. draft → scan banned list → check puffery), so it sits at the level-2 anchor rather than a fully sequenced level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single ~150-line self-contained file with no external references; it is well-sectioned but holds inline content (notably the banned-word lists) that could be split into a reference file, matching the level-2 anchor rather than a one-level-deep reference structure. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |