Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable 7-step workflow with explicit validation and feedback checks, well-organized for a single-file skill. The only drag is the duplicated objective statement that costs a conciseness point.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated purpose: drop the standalone intro line or the '## Objective' section so the description appears once, keeping only the actionable workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The workflow steps are lean and command-driven, but the frontmatter description is duplicated verbatim as both the intro line and the '## Objective' section, which is unnecessary padding. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (gradle tasks), a specific IDE menu path, a real suppression syntax example, and a commit-message template — all copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 1–7 sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (baseline in step 1, verify in step 6 with re-run analysis to confirm the 'Yellow code' count decreased and no regressions). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-file, no external references needed, with well-organized sections (Objective, numbered Workflow Instructions) — meeting the rubric's simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |