Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and a clear candidate list. The main gap is actionability: migration steps give direction rather than copy-paste-ready code examples for each candidate replacement.
Suggestions
Add concrete before/after code snippets for at least the top migration candidates (e.g., `new ArrayList<>()` -> `new SmartList<>()`, `new HashMap<>()` -> `ContainerUtil.newHashMap()`).
Show the exact import lines to use (e.g., `import com.intellij.util.SmartList;`) so changes are copy-paste ready.
Optionally note the single external javadoc link as a reference source rather than an inline instruction so Claude knows it is optional reading.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient: a short candidate list and a numbered workflow with concrete gradle commands, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete gradle commands and migration candidates, but the 'Migrate' step is direction ('Replace standard API with the equivalent') without copy-paste-ready code examples for each candidate. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with explicit baseline and verification checkpoints and a feedback-oriented verify step (test classes, run tests, manual test steps), which matches the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple skill under 50 lines with no need for external references; the well-organized sections (Objective, Candidates, Workflow) satisfy the simple-skills allowance for a score of 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |