Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, actionable, and clearly sequenced with a feedback checkpoint, but it references docs/Triaging.md which is not present in the bundle, breaking progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Either add docs/Triaging.md (or a references/ file) with the triage-process details, or remove the dangling reference and inline the essential setup notes.
Mention the docs/Triaging.md reference only once to avoid redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean bulleted workflow with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place, with only a minor duplicate mention of docs/Triaging.md. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete guidance: a specific repo URL, tooling fallbacks (github-mcp-server / gh auth status), and a detailed per-issue suggestion taxonomy with an explicit wait-for-feedback control loop. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (find unlabeled issues, present one at a time, suggest actions, wait for feedback, continue) is explicit with a clear user-feedback checkpoint, and the read-mostly non-destructive scope fits the rubric's simple-skill allowance. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body signals a one-level reference to docs/Triaging.md, but that file does not exist in the bundle (no references/assets/docs directories are present), so the navigation pointer is broken. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |