Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable multi-phase workflow with strong validation checkpoints and feedback loops, appropriately delegating heavy logic to a helper script. Minor improvements are possible around placeholder resolution guidance and template-path organization.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and leans on concrete commands, but the Constraints section repeats frontmatter restrictions and the before/after template examples, while justified, add length that could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands are given for each phase (flutter_cp.dart with --action start/continue, git status --porcelain, gh pr edit, gh issue view) with exit-code branching, but placeholders like <DART_EXECUTABLE> and an inline <FINAL_TEMPLATE> body require resolution and shell-quoting care. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four phases are clearly sequenced with explicit GATING STEPS, a clean-repo validation check, exit-code-based branching, a conflict-resolution retry loop, and a mandatory user-approval gate before applying the template. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Heavy orchestration logic is correctly delegated to the verified scripts/flutter_cp.dart and the CP template is referenced one level deep, but the template path lives outside the skill bundle (../../../.github/...) and there is no organized references/ directory. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |