Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a highly actionable, project-specific guide with an executable template, exact commands, and explicit verification steps. Its weaknesses are mild: some duplication between the template comments and the guidelines list, no error-recovery loop after the test/analyze steps, and all guidance inlined in one ~170-line file rather than split into references.
Suggestions
Remove the duplication between the inline comments in the Dart template and the 'Key guidelines' list (state each convention once, in whichever location is clearer) to tighten conciseness.
Add an explicit feedback loop after the test and analyze steps, e.g. 'If tests or analysis fail, fix the model or test and re-run' to reach level-5 workflow clarity.
Consider moving the validation-helper table and/or the 'Use the data model from a page' section into a references/ file linked from SKILL.md to reduce the inline footprint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with project-specific knowledge Claude cannot infer (mapper naming conventions, part directives, validation helpers, custom test matchers), but the inline comments in the Dart template partially duplicate the 'Key guidelines' list, and Effective Dart doc-comment guidance is stated twice — minor trimming opportunities that keep it below level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: a complete annotated Dart model template, exact commands ('dart run build_runner build --delete-conflicting-outputs', 'dart test test/models/content/content_models_test.dart', 'dart analyze lib/src/models/content/'), concrete file paths, a validation helper table, named custom matchers, and copy-paste-ready decodeJsonList/decodeJsonObject usage — matching the level-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear ('Before starting' → conventions → codegen → tests → run tests → analyze) with verification checkpoints (run tests, run analysis), but there is no explicit feedback loop telling Claude what to do when tests or analysis fail (fix and re-run), which the level-5 anchor requires. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single file is well-organized with clear section headers, a table, and focused code blocks, and no bundle files exist so nothing is misfiled. However, at ~170 lines, content like the validation-helper table or the page-usage section could live in reference files, and the simple-skill exception (under 50 lines) does not apply — good structure with minor organization gaps, i.e. level 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |