Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is exceptionally concise and well-structured as a thin routing adapter, with a clear sequenced contract and grade-based branching. Its weakness is actionability: it routes to external files rather than giving executable, self-contained steps.
Suggestions
Include at least one concrete invocation example or minimal inline command so Claude can act without first reading external files.
Add a brief validation/confirmation checkpoint (e.g. confirm consensus, divergences, blind spots, synthesis are all present before returning).
Verify the referenced vibe paths exist in the bundle and, if possible, mirror the key Template 6 outline inline so the skill is self-sufficient when vibe is absent.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: short sections, no padding, no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, every line carries information. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It points to concrete file paths (vibe/protocols/team.md, references/team-templates.md, Template 6/7) but provides no executable commands or code; the guidance is routing-level rather than copy-paste ready, and the cited files are external and unverifiable here. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear two-step sequence (route to vibe Dialectic Mode, then produce a named four-part output) with grade-specific branches; minor gap is that no validation/checkpoint is shown, though the operation is non-destructive routing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well organized into clearly signaled sections (Use Cases, Execution Contract, Compatibility Notes) with one-level-deep references to the vibe bundle; minor gap is that the referenced paths point to another skill's bundle rather than a local references/ directory. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |