Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and clearly structured with a grade-based execution contract, but it is thin on actionable detail and defers all real logic to an external skill. Referenced files are not present in the bundle, weakening progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add at least one concrete example of the expected output (e.g., a sample consensus/divergence/synthesis block) to raise actionability.
Include a lightweight validation or self-check step in the workflow for verifying the synthesis covers the input design approaches.
Either ship the referenced vibe files within this skill's bundle or note explicitly that they belong to the external 'vibe' skill so progressive disclosure is not broken.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized into short sections with no padded explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries operational intent, matching the lean/efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It points to concrete files (vibe/protocols/team.md, vibe/references/team-templates.md) and lists output components, but provides no executable code or commands and relies on external skill files for the actual logic. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are numbered and sequenced, and grade-based handling (M/L/XL) is laid out, but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops for the comparison/synthesis output. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It signals one-level-deep references to vibe files, but those referenced files do not exist in this skill's bundle, so the navigation points outward to another skill rather than to verified local materials. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |