Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured review skill body with a clear sequenced workflow and validation checkpoints. The only meaningful improvement is reducing the repetitive emphasis on the mandatory sequential numbering requirement.
Suggestions
Consolidate the sequential-numbering requirement into a single clearly marked statement instead of restating it as REQUIRED, MANDATORY REQUIREMENT, NON-NEGOTIABLE, CRITICAL, and MUST across multiple sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient checklists and concrete workflow steps, but the sequential-numbering requirement is restated redundantly across sections (REQUIRED, MANDATORY, NON-NEGOTIABLE, CRITICAL, MUST, multiple do-NOT reminders) and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete MCP tool names, exact comment-format templates, the specific 'COMMENT' event type, and a worked checklist with examples — fully executable guidance for the review task. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 5-step PR-mode workflow with an explicit collection checkpoint before posting, a parallel-posting step, a submit step, and a final-check feedback loop that re-verifies numbering and format. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a single well-signaled one-level-deep external reference (@./../_shared/metabase-style-guide.md) and appropriately inlined review guidance; no bundle files exist to further split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |