CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

docx-comment-reply

Reply to comments (批注) in Word .docx/.doc files: extract comment context, draft replies, write threaded replies back, and validate OOXML.

74

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, executable skill body: concise, copy-paste-ready commands referencing real scripts, a clearly sequenced workflow with required validation, and clean one-level-deep references to the bundle.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what a .docx or comment is, and every section (outputs, workflow, parallel) earns its place, matching the score-3 lean-and-efficient anchor.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready, executable commands referencing real bundled scripts (e.g. `python scripts/extract_comment_context.py --input "..."` and the apply script with all flags), matching the score-3 fully-executable anchor.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly numbered 1–4 sequence with an explicit required validation step ("校验(必须)") and default schema/redlining validation on save; validation is present so no cap applies, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The SKILL.md is a concise overview pointing one level deep to real bundled scripts (verified present in scripts/), with well-organized sections and clear navigation, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, third-person description with strong capability listing and natural bilingual trigger terms, but it omits an explicit 'Use when...' clause so the 'when to use' guidance is only implied.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks to reply to comments/批注 in a Word document or mentions threaded comment replies.'

Consider adding '.doc' and 'review comments' as additional natural trigger variations.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "extract comment context, draft replies, write threaded replies back, and validate OOXML" — matching the score-3 anchor of several specific actions, not just a domain name.

3 / 3

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does but lacks any "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, so per the rubric guideline completeness is capped at 2 (has what, when is only implied).

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms a user would say are covered in both languages: "comments", "批注", "Word .docx/.doc files", "replies", matching the score-3 anchor of good natural-term coverage rather than technical jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is specific — threaded comment replies in Word with OOXML validation — with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.