CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

iso-13485-certification

Comprehensive toolkit for preparing ISO 13485 certification documentation for medical device Quality Management Systems. Use when users need help with ISO 13485 QMS documentation, including (1) conducting gap analysis of existing documentation, (2) creating Quality Manuals, (3) developing required procedures and work instructions, (4) preparing Medical Device Files, (5) understanding ISO 13485 requirements, or (6) identifying missing documentation for medical device certification. Also use when users mention medical device regulations, QMS certification, FDA QMSR, EU MDR, or need help with quality system documentation.

65

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./bundled/skills/iso-13485-certification/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A thorough, well-structured, actionable skill body that makes good use of bundled references, scripts, and templates. Its main weakness is verbosity: substantial content Claude already knows is inlined rather than delegated to the reference files.

Suggestions

Move the full '31 Required Documented Procedures' list, the per-region regulatory summary, and the document retention periods into a reference file and summarize them in SKILL.md to reduce verbosity.

Trim generic best-practice guidance ('Avoid jargon', 'Clear responsibilities', 'Realistic timeframes') that Claude already knows, keeping only domain-specific advice.

Add an explicit validate-and-retry feedback loop around the gap_analyzer.py run (e.g., re-run after addressing missing documents) to strengthen workflow clarity for batch operations.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

At ~670 lines the body is noticeably verbose, restating domain knowledge Claude already knows (the full 31-procedure list, per-region regulatory summaries, document retention periods) and padded with generic best-practice advice like 'Avoid jargon' and 'Clear responsibilities'.

2 / 5

Actionability

Provides an executable command ('python scripts/gap_analyzer.py --docs-dir ... --output gap-report.json'), concrete template paths, explicit placeholder lists, and validation checklists — concrete guidance with only minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step processes are clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints and checklists (Quality Manual validation checklist, pre-audit checklist, gap-analysis review steps); minor gaps in explicit feedback loops for the few destructive/batch operations.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Body is a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to four real reference files, one script, and three real templates; minor organization gap because the 31-procedure list and regulatory/retention summaries that belong in references are inlined.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that clearly states what the skill does and when to use it, with natural trigger terms and low conflict risk. Third-person voice is maintained throughout.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'conducting gap analysis', 'creating Quality Manuals', 'developing required procedures', 'preparing Medical Device Files', 'identifying missing documentation' — with comprehensive coverage of the skill's capabilities.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (a comprehensive toolkit for ISO 13485 certification documentation) and 'when' via a 'Use when...' clause with six numbered triggers plus an additional 'Also use when...' clause.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms users would say are well covered including 'ISO 13485', 'QMS documentation', 'medical device regulations', 'QMS certification', 'FDA QMSR', and 'EU MDR'.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche (ISO 13485 medical device QMS certification) with distinct, domain-specific triggers that are unlikely to conflict with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (678 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 5 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.