Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and well-structured for a simple skill, but it lacks concrete executable guidance and an explicit sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints, keeping actionability and workflow clarity at 3.
Suggestions
Add a short concrete worked example or formula template for a representative metric computation to raise actionability.
Provide a minimal sequenced workflow (e.g. identify formula -> gather inputs -> compute -> sanity-check units/denominators) with an explicit validation checkpoint.
Spell out the sanity-check step as a verifiable action rather than just listing it as a possible output.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-sectioned with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place, matching the anchor 5 example. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete-ish guidance (metric types, conversion targets, sanity checks), but the guidance stays generic without specific formulas or executable steps, fitting anchor 3. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | No sequenced multi-step workflow is provided and validation checkpoints are only mentioned as an output rather than a process step; even for a simple skill this lands at anchor 3 due to implicit sequence and missing checkpoints. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, needs no external references, and is organized into clear sections, meeting the simple-skill exception for a score of 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |