Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, highly actionable workflow with strong validation checkpoints, but it is somewhat verbose for a single file and does not use progressive disclosure to offload the taxonomy and format templates into reference files.
Suggestions
Move the ambiguity/coverage taxonomy into a references file (e.g., taxonomy.md) and summarize the categories inline with a single pointer.
Move the detailed option-table and short-answer output templates into a references file, keeping only the format keys inline.
De-duplicate the question-quota rules (stated in steps 3, 4, and the behavior rules) to a single authoritative statement.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly necessary instructional content (taxonomy, format templates, integration rules), but the question quota is restated several times (step 3, step 4, behavior rules) and a few tangential notes (single-quote escape syntax) could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides highly concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance (exact command, JSON fields, output format templates, markdown table, bullet syntax), with only minor interpretation gaps such as 'most appropriate section' mapping. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 8-step process with explicit validation checkpoints (step 6 checklist, save-after-each-integration, JSON parse failure aborts) and feedback loops for error recovery on repeated file edits. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single ~175-line file with organized sections but no bundle references; substantial content (the taxonomy and output-format templates) that could live in separate reference files is inlined. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |