Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-sequenced, actionable guide with strong validation checkpoints and feedback loops, but it loses points on progressive disclosure because every referenced prompt-template file is missing from the bundle, leaving the detailed material unreachable.
Suggestions
Add the referenced prompt-template files (implementer-prompt.md, spec-reviewer-prompt.md, code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md) to the bundle, or inline their key contents so the references resolve.
Trim the Advantages and Red Flags lists to non-redundant items; the process graph already conveys most of the workflow guarantees.
Show at least one concrete subagent dispatch call (e.g. a sample Task tool invocation with the implementer prompt) so the example workflow is directly executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — dot-graph decision and process diagrams plus a compact example workflow carry the load with little concept explanation — but the Advantages/Red Flags bullet lists repeat ideas already implied by the diagrams, a minor trim opportunity. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable guidance: a per-task process graph with named subagent prompts and a full worked example showing dispatch, Q&A, review output, and fix loops, though the actual prompt-template contents are referenced rather than shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step process is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (spec-then-quality review order) and feedback loops (reviewer finds issues → implementer fixes → re-review until approved), plus a final whole-implementation review — matching the explicit-validation-with-feedback-loops anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure and sectioning are reasonable and references are signaled, but the body points to three prompt-template files (./implementer-prompt.md, ./spec-reviewer-prompt.md, ./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md) that are not present in the bundle, so navigation to the actual detailed material is broken. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |