Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a high-density, actionable guideline set with executable examples and excellent progressive disclosure via real, one-level-deep reference files. The only gap is the lack of explicit validation or feedback loops in its workflows, which caps workflow clarity at 2.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step to the 'Running the App' flow (e.g. 'Confirm the app opens and the changed route renders before iterating further') to introduce a validation checkpoint.
De-duplicate the contentInsetAdjustmentBehavior / safe-area guidance so it is stated once and referenced, reducing token redundancy.
List ./references/form-sheet.md in the References section (it exists but is only covered inline) for consistency in navigation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean, prescriptive rulebook of bullet-point directives with concise executable code samples and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; minor redundancy (e.g. contentInsetAdjustmentBehavior mentioned a few times) does not rise to the level-2 verbosity anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready rules ('Always use kebab-case for file names, e.g. comment-card.tsx', 'expo-audio not expo-av') and complete executable examples for Link, Stack.Screen, modal, sheet, and layouts. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Running the App' section offers a clear sequenced decision flow (try Expo Go, test, only then custom build) with explicit criteria, but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops anywhere, capping this dimension at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-signaled References section lists 11 one-level-deep reference files, each with a short description, and every referenced path resolves to a real file in ./references/; the body acts as an overview pointing to detail. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |