Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, lean instruction skill with concrete example copy, a clear pre-write/write/check workflow, and exemplary progressive disclosure through five clearly signaled reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout: it assumes Claude's writing competence and offers craft directives ("Use contractions. Read it aloud.", "Every sentence must earn its place") rather than padding with definitions of what cold email is; not a 4 because there is no over-explanation to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance with specific example phrasings — interest-based CTAs ("Worth exploring?"), subject-line examples ("reply rates," "hiring ops," "Q2 forecast"), and full framework templates with sample copy ("You noticed X, which usually means Y challenge. We helped Z with that. Interested?"); these cover the common cases copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence — check for product-marketing-context.md, gather the five situational inputs, write per the principles, then run the Quality Check gut-check list — with an explicit final checklist; not a 5 because the checklist is a soft gut-check rather than a validate/fix/retry feedback loop, which suits this non-destructive task but leaves a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview body pointing to five well-signaled one-level-deep references (personalization.md, frameworks.md, subject-lines.md, follow-up-sequences.md, benchmarks.md), each real file in ./references/ and each link paired with a one-line description of its contents, enabling easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |